(continued)

DGR

Survey Results

To Comment on this article Click Here

Will the Joint Review Panel approve the DGR on May 7th?

Results

Saugeen Times

No

22.95%

Yes

77.05%

 

100.00%

Results

Kincardine Times

No

30.77%

Yes

69.23%

 

100.00%

 

*Please note we remove duplicate votes from the same source.  Computers keep track of that type of thing easily.  It's a waste of time voting more than once.  If you have a  longer comment than 400 characters, Please email us with your extended comment..

In this survey there were an inordinate number of multiple votes with a comment that indicated anger and/or frustration.  We counted only one vote whether No or Yes. 

 Multiple voting .... hmmmm.  You can express your opinion easily in the comments without trying to influence the vote one way or another.  Most people just vote and don't comment.

 

Are you willing to pay more taxes so your services w

 

Reader Comments

For sure
_______________________________
They will punt
_______________________________

I believe it will
_______________________________
I think they will.... not sure
_______________________________
No other site was ever considered. The hosting agreement is fraught with one sided conditions. The property value protection clause only protects OPG. 8 independent expert engineers and scientists provided evidence to the JRP proving that the DGR should not be built. 8 years of illegal secret meeting held this OPG, Bruce County Council and NWMO
_______________________________
Science and facts will prevail over opinions expressed by self-experts without credentials.
 --------------------------------------------------------
Whatever the government wants it gets. Think wind turbines in your backyard. The community has been bought. Now is time to pay.
_______________________________
The scientific data supporting a DGR as a safe, solid, preferred method of containment is there in black and white. Information is the power that stokes the engine of responsible action. Get it done! It is logical, it is necessary, and it is time.
_______________________________
Not if they care about the future of our great lakes.
_______________________________
They will make a recommendation to the federal minister based on scientific data and knowledge not on opinion supplied by antinuke groups locally and globally.
_______________________________
they will side with big business
_______________________________
The Science is sound, there is no reason not to!
_______________________________
Yes, there will be conditions though. And as per the process we'll go through all of this again when they're ready to start to load waste.
_______________________________
Because science will tell us that the sky is not falling...
_______________________________
I hope not. However money talks around this area even if doing this lacks any form of common sense. People are afraid to speak up to protect our lake if it means losing money. Sad state of affairs.
_______________________________

maybe so
_______________________________
The CNSC staff have recommended approval to the JRP. OPG's proposal for an under ground DGR for LLW & ILW is based on science. Other DGR's exist in the world. Extensive geological site testing has shown that the proposed Bruce site is safe.
_______________________________
I hope so. It would be good for the surrounding Municipalities for jobs, etc.
_______________________________
Too much opposition
_______________________________
why not its been here for many years now,this is safer storage,lake is 180 ft deep,,burial is much deeper,cant hurt anything,we made the waste we store our waste,simple
_______________________________
dispite some concern it is the best pace for it
_______________________________
Report will be delayed for political reasons.
_______________________________
 

 


 

 

 

for world news, books, sports, movies ...

Wednesday, May 06, 2015