General Motors' 15 level hierarchy of
management bureaucracy was a constant source of frustration for those of
us who were chartered with changing the organization. Even though I was
part of a group advising Roger Smith, the president of GM, I was told
that my efforts were much like being a gnat on an elephant's butt trying
to change its direction.
Smith tossed the pieces of organizations around so much that he
disturbed the structure of the company. What he did not realize was that
the giant 15 level organization chart of GM meant little or nothing
relative to getting cars out. People knew each other over time. They
knew people at Design Staff or Cadillac or Fisher Body who would help or
do things out of the organization chart. Smith's constant and dramatic
organization changes moved people around so much that they lost track of
each other and could not respond quickly enough to make a difference.
Also, GM could no longer manage very good segments of its business,
which were small by GM standards. GM got rid of GM Robotics and then
found that they needed robotics. They got rid of Detroit Diesel and
others, which were profitable under different and new management
(Penske, Fanuc etc). They also got rid of the great cash cow, GM Parts
Division, but kept the pension and the health care obligation!
GM had groups for both CAD/CAM and computer security where I was a
senior project manager. They became whole industr ies
and GM ignored that too. The distance
between Smith and people who knew how to do things caused all this
folly. Like most big companies, GM added a level of hierarchy to the
company every time it got bigger.
Have you ever played that game where you whisper something in
someone's ear and they pass it on? What happens after it gets passed on
fifteen times? The fifteenth person has no clue as to what was
originally said.
Shortly after I left GM, many companies began to realize that these
levels reduced competitiveness and prevented senior management from
understanding what was going on in the company. Much too late, GM
started eliminating levels of middle management with no regard for who
really understood the business - resulting in a series of disastrous
losses in money and market share. No wonder Asia makes most of our
stuff.
Had GM senior management understood its engineering, manufacturing,
distribution and information systems, it could have successfully
downsized and restructured. Once many management layers are eliminated,
who looks after employees? The answer is -- Employees are self-directed.
(next column)

13/01/2009 04:17 PM |
(continued)
Unlike me, young people should learn to follow and lead in a
bureaucracy since civilization is built on them. This is why the Liberal
Education as defined in the next reflection is so important; every
college graduate should have a foundation to become an effective leader
or follower.
In his Nobel Prize winning book, "The Glass Bead Game," Herman Hesse
describes a monastic order of intellectuals that run a boarding school
for boys and nurture and play the Glass Bead Game. After 30 years, a
distinguished member of the order resigns because he comes to the
conclusion that organizations maintain themselves by rewarding obedience
with privilege. The organizational bureaucracy "had been infected by the
characteristic disease of elitehood -- hubris, conceit, class arrogance,
self-righteousness, exploitiveness."
Since 1991, Carnegie Mellon has developed Capability Maturity Models
for a myriad of disciplines. To minimize hierarchy and " elitehood" in
bureaucracy, its People Capability Maturity Model identifies elements
for a work force to manage itself:
- Workforce Planning coordinates
workforce activities with current and future business needs.
- Workgroup Development organizes work around competency-based
process abilities.
- Competency Development constantly enhances capability of the
workforce to perform their assigned tasks.
- Career Development ensures that individuals develop workforce
competencies that achieve career objectives.
Participatory Culture
ensures a flow of information within the organization to incorporate
the knowledge of individuals into decision-making processes.
Competency-Based Practices ensures that all workforce practices
are based in part on developing competencies.
Underlying many of the problems of this century are inept
bureaucracies in Federal and local governments and our major companies.
At the heart of inept bureaucracies are people who don't know what to do
or how to do it or both.
For Reflection 1

For Reflection 2

For Reflection 3

For Reflection 4

For Reflection 5

Other reading
The demise of manufacturing in North America.

How North America Lost the Auto
 |